Stanley Meyer's super electrolyser

As an Engineer, I don't think I need to explain how I feel about a car running on, and emitting water. After a heated discussion with a gentleman who was close friends with Stanley Meyer before died, I managed to get a copy of this document which outlines Mr. Meyer's technology.
To me this is an amazing resource, even though I believe the whole concept hinges on a false interpretation of thermodynamic laws.
I've asked Bottleweb to host this document: Hydrogen - Meyer - D14.pdf

water fuel
I have recently added one of the supplimental water as fuel devices to my Van big Gm V8 The mileage gain so far is about 10% and I have been keeping track of the mileage since I bought the van 3 years ago It is not fully hooked up right yet but as I drive about 2000 kms a week this is signifigant
interesting
Can you elaborate a bit on what this device does? How does the device draw power? Is it connected to your car battery or does it need to be charged seperately? I'm very interested in this because I've never spoken with anyone who has actually added these kits myself so please share more info.
Jason
http://bottleweb.org/jason
It is a device that hooks up
It is a device that hooks up to the car battery i got mine from eagle resourses but there are many plans on the web You also need an electronic unit to fool the O2 sensors into sending less fuel to the injection system i found it harder to put together than they say and there are ones that use a coil system and I think they might be easier to make and install Ray
cool
I haven't heard of this company. Can you upload some pictures or send me a link? I think this is the sort of thing people should be talking about more on the internet, I see so much speculation and heresay, it's really refreshing to hear about an actual experience. If you have the spare time you could set up an account here and upload some pictures and write a blog page about it, I'm sure there'd be a lot of people who would be interested in something like that.
Jason
http://bottleweb.org/jason
Stanley Meyer's super electrolyser
I have spent a lot of time searching through these supposed 'miracle technologies'. The Stanley Meyer water car doesn't work. It's just an electrical pulse connected to water, which creates hydrogen. The burning of this hydrogen creates heat which can be converted - at a loss - to electrical energy again.
This is a process documented by over 100 years of experimentation and scientific inquiry. Stanley meyer had a limited understanding of electrolysis, and simply doesn't work.
No it's not. The device has never been shown to work, despite the fact that the instructions to make it are extremely simple. If it did work it would allow us to create infinite and free energy. It's a pipe dream.
http://bottleweb.org/jason
Stanley Meyer's super electrolyser
That is true.
Pressurised Hydrogen is dangerous gás.
But gas and diesel are dangerous too.
Stanley Meyer make a engine runs with water, and you can see the engine produces more energy of what it spends to make electrolyse to produce fuel to engine work.
Denying laws of energy conservation.
But the reality laws of energy conservation can be wrong.
The reality is that the water engine works and derespects the laws of the energy conservation.
It´s not the first time the cience are wrong.
Stanley Meyer's super electrolyser
Pressurised Hydrogen is an extremely dangerous gas, and since this invention contradicts the laws of energy conservation it is not a valid technology anyway.
We have agreed to host this file as a reference for anyone who is interested. We do not endorse this technology and certainly don't recommend for anyone to try making this at home.
http://bottleweb.org/administrator
Hoax
I First started researching Stans work at the start of February in 2006. I Contributed to online public forums as well as private ones for sometime now. Just recently i stopped publishing as much due to the lack of common sense, and respect many people in this technology doesn't have. If people continue to think the way they do then this world as you know is doomed.
I am the creator of ionizationX.com and the First Public researcher of Stans alternator since dave lawton. When i first started out in this technology it had nothing to do with stan. Then i found him, it was not my intentions to prove stans devices to be a hoax, it was my intentions to prove them to work. As i have worked with several groups and several people very skilled into the workings of electronics i have finely found my resting place, i have found where i belong in this technology, and followed i am not.
He may be called a hoax now, And yes what he provided to the public eye may very well be a hoax. But in the end when great knowledge steps forth, all will be understood and what stan did will be greatly respected as well as appreciated.
When this time comes, you will then see how smart stan really was, and the ones that lack common sense will be covered with embarrassment. The ones that Claims a hoax will learn that a different angle is always possible. The ones Full of Greed will cause this technology to come forth! Therefor this world will then be adjusted and maybe then there will be no more lacking of common sense. You can be very smart and lack common sense, you can also be very stupid and have great common sense, and then again, DeGreed may choose to keep this technology very well hidden! And last but not least, we could loose our leaders.
Water For Fuel is a very important thing in this world, i can not say it would be the best way to go about things. I would much rather see Happy people making happy dollars paying happy bills, "the way it was 15 years ago" The best option would be for High power to go ahead and put this technology on the market and control it as it is comming faster than you know.
Hello, thanks for your
Hello, thanks for your response. So far I've received mostly negative responses to my article, which is a little dissapointing so it was nice to see a level headed response such as yours. Could you be more specific about your research? What specifically have you researched and what makes you think that it works?
The main reason for my skepticism is mainly that the technology (as it has been explained to me) simply doesn't make a lot of sense, and I have seen no reason why Stanley Meyers "Super Electrolysis" technology is any different to normal electrolysis.
http://bottleweb.org/jason
Truth
CIE Diesel engine, Race Cars, boats, model planes. Super great collection motors that will fit into the palm of your hand!
Compressing any gas raises the temperature in the cylinder chamber on the Power stroke, Normally the gas used is Ambient Air. Air is drawn into the cylinders and is compressed by the pistons at compression ratios as high as 25:1. Near the end of the compression stroke, diesel fuel is injected into the combustion chamber through an injector, but not just any injector, but a special one! The fuel ignites from contact with the air that, due to compression, has been heated to a temperature of about 700 – 900 °C (1300 – 1650 °F). The resulting combustion causes increased heat and expansion in the cylinder, which increases pressure and moves the piston downward. You can think of an diesel engine as a "Liquid To Gas Converter." the fuel ignites upon being injected into the highly compressed air in the combustion chamber.
The Speed at which you move down the road is controlled by the amount of liquid fuel injected, unlike controlling the amount of air ratio in the auto engine, To go faster you simply inject more fuel.
In older diesel engines, a distributor-type injection pump, regulated by the engine, supplies bursts of fuel to injectors which are simply nozzles through which the diesel is sprayed into the engine's combustion chamber.In common rail systems, the distributor injection pump is eliminated. Instead, a high-pressure pump pressurises fuel at up to 2,000 bar (200 MPa, 29,000 psi)[3], in a "common rail". The common rail is a tube that branches off to computer-controlled injector valves, each of which contains a precision-machined nozzle and a plunger driven by a solenoid or piezoelectric actuators. (For example, Mercedes uses piezoelectric actuators in their high power output 3.0L V6 common rail diesel).
Most large marine diesels (often called cathedral engines due to their size) run on heavy fuel oil (sometimes called "bunker oil"), which is a thick, viscous and almost un-flammable fuel which is very safe to store and cheap to buy in bulk as it is a waste product from the petroleum refining industry. The fuel must be heated to thin it out (often by the exhaust header) and is often passed through multiple injection stages to vaporize it.
Diesel fuel is a form of light fuel oil, very similar to kerosene, but diesel engines, especially older or simple designs that lack precision electronic injection systems, can run on a wide variety of other fuels. One of the most common alternatives is vegetable oil from a very wide variety of plants. Some engines can be run on vegetable oil without modification, and most others require fairly basic alterations. Biodiesel is a pure diesel-like fuel refined from vegetable oil and can be used in nearly all diesel engines. The only limits on the fuels used in diesel engines are the ability of the fuel to flow along the fuel lines and the ability of the fuel to lubricate the injector pump and injectors adequately. A related historical note: at the request of the French Government the Otto company demonstrated a Diesel engine at the 1900 Exposition Universelle (World's Fair) which used peanut oil (see biodiesel). The French government were at the time exploring the possibility of using peanut oil as a locally produced fuel in their African colonies. Diesel himself later tested extensively the use of plant oils in his engine and began to actively promote the use of these fuels.
Petrol/gasoline engines are limited in the variety and quality of the fuels they can burn. Older petrol engines fitted with a carburetor required a volatile fuel that would vaporize easily to create the necessary fuel/air mix for combustion. Because both air and fuel are admitted to the cylinder, if the compression ratio of the engine is too high or the fuel too volatile (with too low an octane rating), the fuel will ignite under compression, as in a diesel engine, before the piston reaches the top of its stroke. This pre-ignition causes a power loss and over time major damage to the piston and cylinder. The need for a fuel that is volatile enough to vaporize but not too volatile (to avoid pre-ignition) means that petrol engines will only run on a narrow range of fuels. There has been some success at dual-fuel engines that use gasoline/Ethanol, gasoline/Propane, and gasoline/Methane.
In diesel engines, a mechanical injector system vaporizes the fuel (instead of a Venturi jet in a carburetor as in a petrol engine). This forced vaporisation means that less volatile fuels can be used.
In diesel engines, a mechanical injector system vaporizes the fuel (instead of a Venturi jet in a carburetor as in a petrol engine). This forced vaporisation means that less volatile fuels can be used.More crucially, because only air is inducted into the cylinder in a diesel engine, the compression ratio can be much higher as there is no risk of pre-ignition provided the injection process is accurately timed. This means that cylinder temperatures are much higher in a diesel engine than a petrol engine allowing less combustible fuels to be used.
Meyer, diesel injecter, watertank, Laser distributor for control of high pressure injectors, water fuel heaters etc.
Thrown this post together just for you as i did not write any of it from my own knowledge. accept for that 1 sentence you just read. If you would like to learn more about engines Please referre to http://www.answers.com/topic/diesel-engine as they have anything you would ever want to know about
running a car on water.
I would not have pointed this out nor spoke about it but i know that the public will deny its workings, therfor this knowledge is considered a hoax and will not harm anyone because many lacks the tools and ability to make it work!
The facts are, when you mix Heat, + compression, + liquid, , you get a liquid to gas expansion conversion. You get this on demand. It does not look like stan was running his car on hydroxy, it looks as if the water fuel cell was a coverup that put a blanket on the Real Technology. However there is some files and photos floating around the internet, for some reasone people dont want you to see them. Thats crazy that your not seeing them! Crazy Crazy Crazy.
The text above does not relate to me, i have not tested it. I dont even know how the above text got where it is, i didn't write it! What you read is facts about engines, as well as in the proccess of doing so you learned how to convert a liquid to a gas right there on the spot. This is your super electrolysizer your looking for that seems so complicated in the patents jason. Throw the patents, and stans documents into a camp fire, He did not use anything in them.
That's why I have such a
That's why I have such a problem with it, the only available documentation simply makes no sense. Many people claim that there was "something else" but there's never any actual evidence behind it, it's just heresay and rumours. It's the same with UFOs and the yeti man. Is it real? Well, maybe, who knows. Is it worth having serious scientific discourse about? Probably not...
http://bottleweb.org/jason
electrolizer